“First Desires:” Poetry’s Challenges And Rewards

I’ve had two, what I would call, “rockstar experiences.”  The first was during the ’96 or ’97 H.O.R.D.E Festival in northern California when Lenny Kravitz took the stage.  He was dressed in a skin-tight, silver, sleeveless jump suit that glinted sunlight as he moved.  I had seen him swing his dreadlocks on TV, but seeing him work in real time was something else altogether.

At one point, he quit playing suddenly and back away from the mic.  ”S$&#,” he said, “I almost got electrocuted.”  A brief pause followed.  I was afraid he’d been injured, but he went back to playing soon after a few roadies came on stage and tinkered with the equipment.  The mishap just made him seem cooler.

I was 23 or 24 years old and had been to a lot of other rock shows, in both auditoriums and tiny dives.  But Lenny’s performance was different.  He seemed to blast through whatever conventions I was trying to live up to.  His performance was energetic and primal.  I now have a bit more compassion for those young women screaming after the Beatles.

My second “rockstar experience” actually took place at a poetry reading.  That night, however, the feeling was transformed into something more important and lasting–an appreciation of art that required effort.

This was in the early spring of 2001 or 2002, which would have meant I was 28 or 29 years old.  That night I sat in the balcony of the Babson College’s Sorenson Theater.  I had gotten there early so I could get a good seat.  I wanted an unobstructed view of my favorite poet, CK Williams, the evening’s featured reader.  At one point, I looked at the row of chairs below me and there he was, walking up the center aisle towards the stage.  It was cold out, deep winter–February, I think–and he wore a thick drab-colored coat.  He looked tall and thin, his arms hung loose from his shoulders.  I fought back feelings of rockstar admiration for him, which were entirely unexpected.  But the emotion quickly changed as soon as he started reading.  I was not bowled over by sound and imagery.  I had to listen up.  And his words immediately appealed to my intellect and its complex, subtler set of emotions.

William’s poem, “First Desires,” speaks to the challenges and frustrations we must endure to appreciate art.  (Read it on the New Yorker’s website.)  When first listening to classical music, we try to “get it” beyond the welling up of emotion.  At first, “there are only volumes and velocities thickenings and thinnings…”  These “touch within you, through your body, to be part of you/and then apart from you.”  You want to learn more, but even when you do get something, “the grainy timbre of the single violin, the/ardent arpeggios of the horn,” there are still “uneases and confusions left, an/ache, a sense of longing…”  You want to blame “a flaw of logic in the structure, or in (you knew it was more likely) you.”

CK William’s poem both embodies the struggle and rewards of art.  Any appreciation of art demands effort on the part of the viewer/listener/reader. Our initial emotional responses quickly fade unless we are patient and cultivate a kind of deeper understanding. I often feel incapable of moving beyond the my initial experiences with a work of art, especially if I don’t seem to “get it.”  I may even blame the work when it presents a challenge.

Poetry can be like that for me. I love poetry, even try and write it sometimes, but it’s often so hard to grasp, and I get lazy.  But poetry rewards are many.

For the past several months, I’ve been enrolled in Goucher College’s MFA in creative nonfiction writing program.  Last semester, my advisor was Richard Todd.  He announced at the start that we would be reading and discussing poetry instead nonfiction by saying the language would be good for us.  Read for pleasure, he said, and get the voices the best users of our language into your heads. “This is very purifying diction,” he said.  ”It washes out some of the toxins.”

 

Writer’s Brush

Since I was small, I have wanted to paint. But I waited until I was thirty before I actually took up a brush. Why? The simple answer is fear. There are many visual artists in my family. I was afraid I would never measure up to their standards. It was safer not to try.

I write because I have to. I’ve been writing poems and stories for as long as I can remember. Writing has much to do with how I functioned in the world, connect with friends and family, make choices, and make a living.

Being a visual artist is still important to me, so I continue my drawing and painting practices.  I also play music.  I recently started taking drum lessons. I’m not proficient as a painter or a drummer, and I may never be. I still believe filling your life with many different types of creative processes has merits.

And I’m not alone.

Finding the book, Writer’s Brush a few years ago was a turning point in my thinking about incorporating multiple arts into my life. It continues to bolster my confidence in making visual art especially. Editor, Donald Friedman presents a catalog of visual art by famous writers—Mark Twain, Maxine Hong Kingston, Flannery O’Connor, Sylvia Plath, E. E. Cummings, Derek Walcott—and often includes excerpts of commentary by them about their drawings and paintings.

E. E. Cummings reminds readers that every authentic “work of art is in and of itself alive and that however the arts may differ among themselves, their common function is the expression of that supreme alive-ness which is known as beauty.”

In an excerpt from “The Nature and Aim of Fiction,” an essay published in 1957 and reprinted in Friedman’s book, Flannery O’Connor writes that her main task as a writer is to make the reader see, and she recommends the visual arts to other writers. “Any discipline can help your writing: logic, mathematics, theology, and of course and particularly drawing. Anything that helps you to see, anything that makes you look. The writer should never be ashamed of staring…I know a good many fiction writers who paint, not because they’re any good at painting, but because it helps their writing. It forces them to look at things.”

The last part of O’Connor’s quote—the part about the writers she knows not being any good at painting—has shored up my resolve to keep drawing and painting even when the images I make look like hell, which is most of the time. If I’m too tired and frustrated to aim for Cumming’s spiritually elevated “supreme alive-ness” I can still tell myself I’m reaching for something a bit more useful: painting is good for my writing.

Speaking on the same wavelength, Friedman quotes Derek Walcott who describes his own unsentimental approach to visual art-making: “No seasoned artist ever expects trumpets and a visionary light saying, ‘Go now to the studio.’ You just get up and you do your work as if you are a mason and a carpenter…you get an immense kick out of painting for ten minutes, and then you realize it’s hard.” Writes the editor, Friedman: “Artistry is not a matter of inspiration for Walcott, but of craftsmanship.” It’s that way for me too. Just doing the work is my primary mode of operation, if I have one.

One final note: It helps to have a purpose in making art, especially when creativity seems in short supply.  For me that purpose has been community.  Art brings us together in unique and important ways. It helps us communicate, honor one another’s experiences, and move forward together peacefully. Making art–no matter what it looks like–brings you into the conversation. Your voice matters.

Chuck Close: Art and Human Relationships

Art making is often a solitary business. In fact, many choose to become artists precisely because they enjoy working alone. That is true for painter Chuck Close. In a 2007 television interview with Charlie Rose, Close described the working methods that have allowed him to continue to paint with minimal assistance from others after a spinal artery collapse in 1988 left him paralyzed from the neck down. After a brief period when he thought he would never paint again, physical therapy helped Close regain the use of his arms and hands, but he no longer enjoyed the same freedom of mobility. Close is known internationally for his enormous, nine-foot portraits of human faces—often of personal friends—on canvas. Prior to becoming paralyzed the artist painted with the help of a forklift truck. As a result of his impairment, however, he needed a new working method. Maintaining Independence and solitude were primary goals. “You become an artist because you wanted to be in a room by yourself,” he says. “And all of sudden you’re handicapped and you need help. Well, you want to make it as much like it used to be as you can…” Close’s solution has been to work in a two-story studio where he can move his paintings vertically through a hole in the floor.

Though Close enjoys the seclusion of the art-making process and tries to work unassisted as much as possible, his paintings express the personal connections he shares with other human beings. Close was born with Prosopagnosia, the inability to recognize faces. He has said that the disorder is part of what motivates him to paint enormous portraits of friends and family members’ faces. Through his paintings he hopes to etch the details of people’s faces onto his memory so that when he meets with them again “face-to-face,” he will know them more deeply.

Close’s work reminds us that regardless of how it gets made, all art is done in the context of the community in which it is made. Art—whether it is painting, music, poetry, or dance—speaks through self-expression and shared transcendence. It is a byproduct of human relationship.